Comments on: True or False: Singapore to Reduce Carbon Emissions Growth by 16% from 2020 BAU Levels http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/ Green Resource Guide for Singapore and Asia Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:50:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: What do we want from our new Environment Minister? : Green Kampong – Inspiring a greener today http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-165812 What do we want from our new Environment Minister? : Green Kampong – Inspiring a greener today Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:02:53 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-165812 [...] Today’s a good day to tell Dr Balakrishnan that it’s not just about promoting Singapore’s business and economic interests. [...] [...] Today’s a good day to tell Dr Balakrishnan that it’s not just about promoting Singapore’s business and economic interests. [...]

]]> By: Singapore Adopts 16% CO2 Emissions Cut from BAU By 2020 « Singapore Fights Climate Change? http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-88258 Singapore Adopts 16% CO2 Emissions Cut from BAU By 2020 « Singapore Fights Climate Change? Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:26:51 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-88258 [...] Credit: AsiaIsGreen (http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-1...) [...] [...] Credit: AsiaIsGreen (http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-1...) [...]

]]> By: The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 49 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87584 The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 49 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:00:21 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87584 [...] Green Dot - AsiaIsGreen: True or False: Singapore to Reduce Carbon Emissions Growth by 16% from 2020 BAU Levels - Readings From A Political Duo-ble: Debunking Singapore’s government claims on climate change [...] [...] Green Dot – AsiaIsGreen: True or False: Singapore to Reduce Carbon Emissions Growth by 16% from 2020 BAU Levels – Readings From A Political Duo-ble: Debunking Singapore’s government claims on climate change [...]

]]> By: nocolour http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87537 nocolour Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:51:19 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87537 the melting polar ice caps, as well as the shrinking ice-shelfs of Greenland aren't going to wait for Singapore to be good and ready by 2020 to reduce carbon emissions. THIS ISN'T A POLITICAL ISSUE - IT"S AN ENVIRONMENTAL ONE> why are politicians all over the world still playing taiji over this? the melting polar ice caps, as well as the shrinking ice-shelfs of Greenland aren’t going to wait for Singapore to be good and ready by 2020 to reduce carbon emissions.

THIS ISN’T A POLITICAL ISSUE – IT”S AN ENVIRONMENTAL ONE> why are politicians all over the world still playing taiji over this?

]]> By: Eugene http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87496 Eugene Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:10:07 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87496 If the economy is growing fast and if we have already done a large part of carbon reductions (by switching of fuel to natural gas), the higher 5% BAU annual emissions growth could be right. Would welcome anyone to challenge and prove that what I'm saying is wrong. Because I truly want to believe that Singapore is doing something to reduce emissions. If the economy is growing fast and if we have already done a large part of carbon reductions (by switching of fuel to natural gas), the higher 5% BAU annual emissions growth could be right.

Would welcome anyone to challenge and prove that what I’m saying is wrong. Because I truly want to believe that Singapore is doing something to reduce emissions.

]]> By: Marcus Tay http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87492 Marcus Tay Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:24:00 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87492 Great Article. I hope someone explains this cause otherwise it is really creepy that our before and after cuts carbon growth rates is still at 3.6%. Way too creepy and very disappointed. Great Article. I hope someone explains this cause otherwise it is really creepy that our before and after cuts carbon growth rates is still at 3.6%.

Way too creepy and very disappointed.

]]> By: The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 4 Dec 2009 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87481 The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 4 Dec 2009 Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:00:43 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87481 [...] Green Dot - AsiaIsGreen: True or False: Singapore to Reduce Carbon Emissions Growth by 16% from 2020 BAU Levels - Readings From A Political Duo-ble: Debunking Singapore’s government claims on climate change [...] [...] Green Dot – AsiaIsGreen: True or False: Singapore to Reduce Carbon Emissions Growth by 16% from 2020 BAU Levels – Readings From A Political Duo-ble: Debunking Singapore’s government claims on climate change [...]

]]> By: Charles http://www.asiaisgreen.com/2009/12/03/true-or-false-singapore-to-reduce-carbon-emissions-growth-by-16-from-2020-bau-levels/#comment-87461 Charles Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:45:45 +0000 http://www.asiaisgreen.com/?p=1449#comment-87461 I also did a blog post on this emissions reduction proposal. I listed seven things the mainstream media didn't highlight. After chatting to someone about the projected 16% cut, I found a newswire that reported this cut was based on 'current levels'. Because Straits Times and TODAY did not really mention, it has I think become a guessing game. Great article by the way I also did a blog post on this emissions reduction proposal. I listed seven things the mainstream media didn’t highlight. After chatting to someone about the projected 16% cut, I found a newswire that reported this cut was based on ‘current levels’. Because Straits Times and TODAY did not really mention, it has I think become a guessing game. Great article by the way

]]>